奥巴马获奖感言50字 通用63句
1. 2 修辞风格
2. ry superpower.But the world must remember that it was not simply international institutions - not just treaties and declarations - that brought stability to a post-World War II world. Whatever mistakes we have made, the plain fact is this: The United States of America has helped underwrite global se
3. 重复（repetition）在汉语的修辞手法里是不单列出
4. 语气的顺应———疑问语气和虚拟语气的运用而产生的移情。
5. 也纷纷致力于用条文限制战争的破坏力。“正义战争”的概念由此形成，亦即认为，在符合以下几个具体条件时，战争是正义的：如果战争是最后手段或是为自我防御；如果武力程度适当；以及在一切可能的情况下不对平民使用暴力。Of course, we know that for most of history, this concept of “just war” was rarely observed. The capacity of human beings to think up new ways to kill one another proved inexhaustible, as did our capacity to exempt from mercy those who look different or pray to a different God. Wars between armies gave way to wars between nations - total wars in which the distinction between combatant and civil
6. nd inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace. But I also know that this prize reflects the kind of world that those men and women, and all Americans, want to build – a world that gives life to the promise of our founding documents.And I know that, throughout history,
7. 用细腻的笔触和激昂的语言，真诚地传递出对竞选对手、竞争党派、亲朋好友、广大选民乃至国际社会的由衷感激、深情答谢和高度赞誉。
8. e world who have been jailed and beaten in the pursuit of justice; those who toil in humanitarian organizations to relieve suffering; the unrecognized millions whose quiet acts of courage and compassion inspire even the most hardened cynics. I cannot argue with those who find these men and women - some known, some obscure to all but those they help - to be far more deserving of this honor than I.不过，如果不坦承你们这项厚爱有加的决定所引起的相当激烈的争议，那我就有失疏忽了。 （笑声）其中部分原因是，我在世界舞台上的奋斗才刚刚开始，而不是接近尾声。与曾经获此殊荣的一些历史巨人相比史怀哲（Schw
9. 排比(paralldism)
10. 用518个字的特写方式，重点讲述了了一位亚特兰大的106岁的黑人老妇人安·^v^·库柏热心投票的爱国热情，并从她的视角回顾了美国经济的发展、壮大以及繁荣的过程。也回顾了美国消除种族歧视、性别歧视成为一个人人平等的民主社会的历程，以此来审视现实和展望美好的未来。
11. countries, America will always be a voice for those aspirations that are universal. We will bear witness to the quiet dignity of reformers like Aung Sang Suu Kyi; to the bravery of Zimbabweans who cast their ballots in the face of beatings; to the hundreds of thousands who have marched silently thr
12. Axis powers, World War II was a conflict in which the total number of civilians whodied exceeded the number of soldiers who perished.In the wake of such destruction, and with the advent of the nuclear age, it became clear to victor and vanquished alike that the world needed institutions to prevent a
13. statesmen seek to regulate the destructive power of war. The concept of a“just war ” emerged,suggesting that war is justified only when certain conditions were met: if it is waged as a last resort or in self-defense; if the force used is proportional; and if, whenever possible, civilians are spared
14. I am committed to upholding this treaty. It is a centerpiece of my foreign policy. An d I m working with President Medvedev to reduce America and Russia s nuclear stockpiles.But it is also incumbent upon all of us to insist that nations like Iran and North Korea do not game the system. Those who cla
15. 时态的顺应———现在时的运用而产生的移情。
16. e inherent rights and dignity of every individual can truly be lasting.It was this insight that drove drafters of the Universal Declaration ofHumanRights after the Second World War. In the wake of devastation, they recognized that if human rights are not protected, peace is a hollow promise.And yet
17. here human beings do nothave access to enough food, or clean water, or the medicine and shelter they n eed to survive. It does not exist where children cant aspire toa decent education or a job that supports a family. The absence of hope can rot a society from within.And that s why helping farmers f
18. l. And the closer we stand together, the less likely wewill be faced with the choice between armed intervention and complicity in oppression.This brings me to a second point - the nature of the peace that we seek. For peace is not merely the absence of visible conflict. Only a just peace based on th
19. we have a moral and strategic interest in binding ourselves to certain rules of conduct.And even as we confront a viciousadversary that abides by no rules, I believe the United States of America must remain a standard bearer in the conduct of war. That is what makes us different from those whom we
20. history;the imperfections of man and the limits of reason.I raise this point, I begin with this point because in manycountries there is a deep ambivalence about military action today, no matter what the cause. And at times, this is joined by a reflexive suspicion of America, the world s sole milita
21. 暗喻(metaphor)
22. artin Luther King Jr. said in this same ceremony years ago: “Violence never brings pe rmanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones. ” As someonewho stands here as a direct consequence of Dr. King s life work, I am living testimony to the moral force of
23. about how to prevent the slaughter of civilians by their own government, or to stop a civil war whose violence and suffering can engulf an entire region.I believe that force can be justified on humanitarian grounds, as it was in the Balkans, or in other places that have been scarred by war. Inaction
24. t China on a path where millions of its citizens have been lifted from poverty and connected to open societies. Pope John Paul s engagement with Poland created space not just for the Catholic Church, but for labor leaders like Lech Walesa. Ronald Reagan s efforts on arms control and embrace of peres
25. rs to come.The leaders and soldiers of NATOcountries, and other friends and allies, demonstrate this truth through the capacity and courage theyve shownin Afghanistan. But in many countries, there is a disconnect between the efforts of those who serve and the ambivalence of the broader public. I und
26. ot seek; one in which we are joined by42 other countries - including Norway - in an effort to defend ourselves and all nations from further attacks.Still, weare at war, and I mresponsible for the deployment of thousands of young Americans to battle in a distant land. Some will kill, and some will be
27. 奥巴马演讲中的语用移情分析
28. elp -to be far more deserving of this honor than I.But perhaps the most profound issue surrounding my receipt of this prize is the fact that I am the Commander-in-Chief of the military of a nation in the midst of two wars. One of these wars is winding down. The other is a conflict that America did n
29. 语气温和，富有亲和力
30. 奥巴马诺贝尔获奖感言-中英对照Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, distinguished members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, citizens of America, and citizens of the world:国王和王后陛下，各位殿下，杰出的挪威诺贝尔委员会（Norwegian Nobel Committee）委员，美国公民及全世界公民们：I receive this honor with deep gratitude and great humility. It is an award that speaks to our highest aspirations - that for all the cruelty and hardship of our world, we are not mere prisoners of fate. Our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice.获此殊荣
31. eace. That has always been the cause of America.That's why the world has always looked to America.And that's why I believe America will continue to lead.Thank you very much. 奥巴马获诺贝尔和平奖的获奖感言 诺贝尔和平奖获奖感言奥巴马 奥巴马获诺贝尔和平奖演讲 奥巴马获诺贝尔和平奖的获奖感言 演讲稿(全文) 奥巴马获09年诺贝尔和平奖演讲 奥巴马获诺贝尔和平奖演讲稿全文 奥巴马诺贝尔和平奖获奖感言情态系统人际意义研究 奥巴马获诺贝尔和平奖演讲稿全文 中英对照 奥巴马总统就荣获诺贝尔和平奖发表讲话 奥巴马总统就荣获诺贝尔和平奖发表讲话[材料]
32. eed their own people - or nations educate their children and care for the sick - is not mere charity. It s also why the world must come together to confront climate change. There is little scientific dispute that if we do nothing, we will face more drought, more famine, more massdisplacement - all of which will fuel more conflict for decades. For this reason, it is not merely scientists and environmental activists who call for swift and forceful action -it smilitary leaders in my own country and others who understand our common security hangs in
33. 3 强化语言能力
34. ry is rightfully proud.And yet, a decade into a new century, this old architecture is buckling under the weight of new threats. The world may no longer shudder at the prospect of war between two nuclear superpowers, but proliferation may increase the risk of catastrophe. Terrorism has long been a ta
35. killed. And so I come here with an acute sense of the costs of armed conflict - filled with difficult questions about the relationship between war and peace, and our effort to replace one with the other.Now these questions are not new. War, in one form or another, appeared with the first man. At th
36. pplies to those who violate international laws by brutalizing their own people. Whenthere is genocide in Darfur, systematic rape in Congo, repression in Burma - there must be consequences. Yes, there will be engagement;yes, there will bediplomacy - but there mustbe consequences when those things fai
37. the Nobel Peace Prize has not just been used to honour specific achievement; it's also been used as a means to give momentum to a set of causes.And that is why I will accept this award as a call to action – a call for all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st-century. These cha
38. too often, these words are ignored. For somecountries, the failure to uphold human rights is excused by the false suggestion that these are somehow Western principles, foreign to local cultures or stages of a nation s development. And within America, there has long been a tension between those who d
39. ian became blurred. In the span of 30 years, such carnage would twice engulf this continent. And while its hard to conceive of a cause more just than the defeat of the Third Reich and the Axis powers, World War II was a conflict in which the total number of civilians who died exceeded the number of soldiers who perished.当然，我们都知道，在人类历史的大部分时间内，这种“正义战争”的概念鲜被理会。人类显然有无穷的能力不断想出新的方式相互残杀，同样也有无穷的能力毫不怜惜那些外貌不同或信仰不同的人。军队之间的战争变成国家间的战争模糊了战斗人员与平民界线的全面战争。这种战争大屠杀曾在 30 年内两度侵吞这块大陆。虽然难以设想还有什么比击败第三帝国（Third Reich）和轴心国（Axis powers）更正义的事业，但在第二次世界大战中死亡的平民总数超过了战死疆场的军人。In the wake of such destruction, and with the advent of the nuclear age, it became clear to victor and vanquished alike that the world needed institutions to prevent another world war. And so, a quarter century after the United States Senate rejected the League of Nations - an idea for which Woodrow Wilson received this prize - America led the world in constructing an architecture to k
40. task to a few countries. Thats why wehonor those who return homefrom peacekeeping and training abroad to Oslo and Rome; to Ottawa and Sydney; to Dhaka and Kigali - we honor them not as makers of war, but of wagers - but as wagers of peace.Let me make one final point about the use of force. Even as
41. that led those who've been told for so long by so
42. g ago. “Let us focus, ” he said, “on a more practical, more attainable peace, based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual evolution in human institut ions. ” A gradual evolution of human institutions.What might this evolution look like? What might these practical steps be?To be
43. cause we seek to impose our will. We have done so out of enlightened self-interest - because we seek a better future for our children and grandchildren, and we believe that their lives will be better if others children and grandchildren can live in freedom and prosperity.So yes, the instruments of w
44. im to respect international law cannot avert their eyes when those laws are flouted.Those who care for their own security cannot ignore the danger of an arms race in the Middle East or East Asia. Those who seek peace cannot stand idly by as nations arm themselves for nuclear war.The same principle a
45. llenges can't be met by any one leader or any one nation.And that's why my administration has worked to establish a new era of engagement in which all nations must take responsibility for the world we seek... Some of the work confronting us will not be completed during my presidency.Some, like
46. fight. That is a source of our strength.That is why I prohibited torture. That is why I ordered the prison atGuantanamo Bay closed. And that is why I have reaffirmed Americascommitment to abide by the Geneva Conventions. Welose ourselves when we compromise the very ideals that we fight to defend. (A
47. curity for morethan six decades with the blood of our citizensand the strength of our arms. The service and sacrifice of our men and womenin uniform has promoted peace and prosperity from Germanyto Korea, and enabled democracy to take hold in places like the Balkans. We have borne this burden not be
48. 第二人称you的使用
49. day a definitive solution to the problems of war. What I do know is that meeting these challenges will require the samevision, hard work, and persistence of those men and women who acted so boldly decades ago. And it will require us to think in new ways about the notions of just war and the imperati
50. from violence.Of course, we know that for most of history, this concept of “just war” was rarely observed. The capacity of human beings to think up new ways to kill one another proved inexhaustible, as did our capacity to exempt from mercy those who look different or pray to a different God. Wars b
51. 1 语言风格
52. pplause.) And we honor - we honor those ideals by upholding them not when it s easy, but when it is hard.I have spoken at somelength to the question that must weigh on our minds and our hearts as we choose to wage war. But let menow turn to our effort to avoid such tragic choices, and speak of three
53. ways that we can build a just and lasting peace.First, in dealing with those nations that break rules and laws, I believe that we must develop alternatives to violence that are tough enough to actually change behavior - for if we want a lasting peace, then the words of the international community m
54. 引用（allusion & quotation）也是演讲常用修辞手
55. 1 理性诉诸(logos)
56. Commercehas stitched much of the world together. Billions have been lifted from poverty. The ideals of liberty and self-determination, equality and the rule of law have haltingly advanced. Weare the heirs of the fortitude and foresight of generations past, and it is a legacy for which my own count
57. ves of a just peace.We must begin by acknowledging the hard truth: We will not eradicate violent conflict in our lifetimes. There will be times when nations -acting individually or in concert - will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified.I makethis statement mindful of what M
58. 2023年奥巴马获诺贝尔和平奖的获奖感言 英语演讲稿：奥巴马获诺贝尔和平奖的获奖感言 [日期：2023-10-12] 来源：网络 作者：未知 [字体：大 中 小] 英语口语练习免费体验最便宜的外教课 模拟英语口语面试 Well, this is not how I expected to wake up this morning.After I received the news, Malia walked in and said, ^v^Daddy, you won the Nobel Peace Prize, and it i
59. 4 小结
60. 4 建构教学模式
61. eitzer）和马丁路德金(King)；马歇尔(Marshall)和^v^ (Mandela)我的成就微不足道。还有全世界为追求正义而遭到监禁和欧打的男女志士；那些为减轻苦难而在人道组织中艰辛工作的人；那千百万默默无闻地以充满勇气和关爱的无声行动让最悲观的愤世嫉俗者也受到感召的人们。我绝不反驳那些认为这样的男女志士有些知名，有些只为他们所帮助的对象所知 远比我有资格获此殊荣的看法。But perhaps the most profound issue surrounding my receipt of this prize is the fact that I am the Commander-in-Chief of the military of a nation in the midst of two wars. One of these wars is winding down. The other is a conflict that America did not seek; one in which we are joined by 42 other countries -
62. 第一人称复数we的使用
63. rship as they please; choose their own leaders or assemble without fear. Pent-up grievances fester, and the suppression of tribal and religious identity can lead to violence. We also know that the opposite is true. Only when Europe became free did it finally find peace. America has never fought a wa
奥巴马获奖感言50字 通用58句
1. 各类演讲中最常用的修辞手法非排比（paral-
2. 语用移情和顺应理论
3. and missions more complex, America cannot act alone. America alone cannot secure the peace. This is true in Afghanistan. This is true in failed states like Somalia, where terrorism and piracy is joined by famine and human suffering. And sadly, it will continue to be true in unstable regions for yea
4. troika not only improved relations with the Soviet Union, but empowered dissidents throughout Eastern Europe. There s no simple formula here. But we must try as best we can to balance isolation and engagement, pressure and incentives, so that human rights and dignity are advanced over time.Third, a
5. and peace, and our effort to replace one with the other.然而，我们仍处在战争时期，是我派遣成千上万名美国年轻人远赴战场。有些人要杀射，有些人要被杀射。因此，我是带着对武装冲突的代价的敏锐感觉来到这里的心中充满有关战争与和平的关系以及我们为用和平取代战争而努力的难题。Now these questions are not new. War, in one form or another, appeared with the first man. At the dawn of history, its morality was not questioned; it was simply a fact, like drought or disease - the manner in which tribes and then civilizations sought power and settled their differences.而这些问题并不新鲜。战争，以这样或那样的形式，随着人类的诞生而出现。在历史初期，战争的道义性无人质疑
6. weapons, and to seek a world without them. In the middle of the last century, nations agreed to be bound by a treaty whose bargain is clear: All will have access to peaceful nuclear power; those without nuclear weaponswill forsake them; and those with nuclear weapons will work towards disarmament.
7. tears at our conscience and can lead to more costly intervention later.That s why all responsible nations must embrace the role that militari es with a clear mandate can play to keep the peace.Americas commitment to global security will never waver. But in a world in which threats are more diffuse,
8. gin with, I believe that all nations - strong and weak alike - must adhere to standards that govern the use of force. I - like any head of state - reserve the right to actunilaterally if necessary to defend mynation. Nevertheless, I am convinced that adhering to standards, international standards, s
9. 阐述了这次总统选举的历史意义。暗示奥巴马的当选符合广大民众的意愿，因此，他的当选也是民众的胜利。
10. trengthens those who do, and isolates and weakens those who don t.The world rallied around America after the 9/11 attacks, and continues to support our efforts in Afghanistan, because of the horror of those senseless attacks and the recognized principle of self-defense. Likewise, the world recognize
11. nother world war. And so, a quarter century after the United States Senate rejected the League of Nations - an idea for which Woodrow Wilson received this prize - America led the world in constructing an architecture to keep the peace: a Marshall Plan and a United Nations, mechanisms to govern the w
12. e beginning, and not the end, of my labors on the world stage. Compared to some of the giants of history whovereceived this prize - Schweitzer and King; Marshall and Mandela - my accomplishments are slight. And then there are the men and women around the world who have been jailed and beaten in the
13. appear arbitrary and undercut the legitimacy of future interventions, no matter how justified.And this becomes particularly important when the purpose of military action extendsbeyond self-defense or the defense of one nation against an aggressor. More and more, we all confront difficult questions
14. d the need to confront SaddamHussein when he invaded Kuwait - a consensus that sent a clear message to all about the cost of aggression.Furthermore, America - in fact, no nation - can insist that others follow the rules of the road if we refuse to follow them ourselves. For when we dont, our actions
15. ctic, but modern technology allows a few small men with outsized rage to murder innocents on a horrific scale.Moreover, wars between nations have increasingly given way to wars within nations. The resurgence of ethnic or sectarian conflicts; the growth of secessionist movements, insurgencies, and fa
16. escribe themselves as realists or idealists - a tension that suggests a stark choice between the narrow pursuit of interests or an endless campaign to impose our values around the world.I reject these choices. I believe that peace is unstable where citizens are denied the right to speak freely or wo
17. 激情四射，富有感染力
18. 3 思维风格
19. ；它是如同干旱或疾病一样的现实是各个部落以及后来的各种文明谋求权力和解决分歧的方式。And over time, as codes of law sought to control violence within groups, so did philosophers and clerics and statesmen seek to regulate the destructive power of war. The concept of a “just war” emerged, suggesting that war is justified only when certain conditions were met: if it is waged as a last resort or in self-defense; if the force used is proportional; and if, whenever possible, civilians are spared from violence.后来，随着旨在控制群体内部暴力的规范的出现，哲学家、宗教领袖和政治家
20. the elimination of nuclear weapons, may not be completed in my lifetime.But I know these challenges can be met so long as it's recognised that they will not be met by one person or one nation alone.This award is not simply about the efforts of my administration – it's about the courageous efforts o
21. Americans who sent a message to the world that we have never been a collection of Red States and Blue States: we are, and always will be, the United States of America. “红色营”暗喻“共和党”，“蓝色阵营”暗喻“民主党”。
22. r against a democracy, and our closest friends are governments that protect the rights of their citizens. No matter how callously defined, neither America s interests- nor the world s - are served by the denial of human aspirations.So even as we respect the unique culture and traditions of different
23. f people around the world. And that's why this award must be shared with everyone who strives for justice and dignity – for the young woman who marches silently in the streets on behalf of her right to be heard even in the face of beatings and bullets; for the leader imprisoned in her own home
24. just peace includes not only civil and political rights - itmust encompass economic security and opportunity. For true peace is not just freedom from fear, but freedom from want.It is undoubtedly true that development rarely takes root without security; it is also true that security does not exist w
25. 对比(contrast)
26. 2 锤炼演讲素养
27. including Norway - in an effort to defend ourselves and all nations from further attacks.但与我获奖有关的最深层的问题可能在于我是一个正打着两场战争的国家的三军统帅。其中一场战争已接近尾声。另一场并非是美国挑起的冲突；有包括挪威在内的 42 个国家在与我们共同努力，为的是保护我们及其他所有国家不再遭受攻击。Still, we are at war, and Im responsible for the deployment of thousands of young Americans to battle in a distant land. Some will kill, and some will be killed. And so I come here with an acute sense of the costs of armed conflict - filled with difficult questions about the relationship between war
28. 反复(repetition)
29. ust mean something. Those regimes that break the rules must be held accountable. Sanctions must exact a real price. Intransigence must be met with increased pressure - and such pressure exists only when the world stands together as one.Oneurgent example is the effort to prevent the spread of nuclear
30. non-violence. I know there s nothing weak - nothing passive - nothing na?ve - in the creed and lives of Gandhi and King.But as a head of state sworn to protect and defend my nation, I cannot be guided by their examples alone. I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to
31. and hardship of our world, we are not mere prisoners of fate. Our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice.And yet I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the considerable controversy that your generous decision has generated. (Laughter.) In part, this is because I amat th
32. THE PRESIDENT: Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, distinguished members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, citizens of America, and citizens of the world: I receive this honor with deep gratitude and great humility. It is an award that speaks to our highest aspirations - that for all the cruelty
33. s Bo's birthday!^v^ And then Sasha added: ^v^Plus, we have a three-day weekend coming up.^v^ So it's good to have kids to keep things in perspective. I am both surprised and deeply humbled by the decision of the Nobel Committee.Let me be clear: I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishm
34. 1 感悟思维差异
35. 对照或对句（antithesis）也是演讲中一个比较常见的修辞手法。该手法通过将对比明显的两个事物或事件
36. 2 情感诉诸(pathos)
37. iled states - all these things have increasingly trapped civilians in unending chaos. In today s wars, many more civilians are killed than soldiers; the seeds of future conflict are sown, economies are wrecked, civil societies torn asunder, refugees amassed, children scarred.I do not bring with meto
38. e dawnof history, its morality was not questioned; it was simply a fact, like drought or disease - the manner in which tribes and then civilizations sought power and settled their differences.And over time, as codes of law sought to control violence within groups, so did philosophers and clerics and
39. outreach -condemnation without discussion - can carry forward only a crippling status quo. No repressive regime can move down a new path unless it has the choice of an open door.In light of the Cultural Revolution s horrors, Nixon s meeting with Mao appeared inexcusable - and yet it surely helped se
40. 结语
41. we make difficult decisions about going to war, we must also think clearly about how we fight it. The Nobel Committee recognized this truth in awarding its first prize for peace to Henry Dunant - the founder of the Red Cross, and a driving force behind the Geneva Conventions.Whereforce is necessary,
42. 用简洁的笔墨和精炼的语言，准确地传达出对建国历程、时代功勋、国际挑战、政治方略和政治信念的精要评价和精辟回答。
43. because she refuses to abandon her commitment to democracy; for the soldier who sacrificed through tour after tour of duty on behalf of someone half a world away; and for all those men and women acro the world who sacrifice their safety and their freedom and sometimes their lives for the cause of p
44. they have us on their side.Let me also say this: The promotion of human rights cannot be about exhortation alone. At times, it must be coupled with painstaking diplomacy. I know that engagementwith repressive regimes lacks the satisfying purity of indignation. But I also know that sanctions without
45. ough the streets of Iran. It is telling that the leaders of these governments fear the aspirations of their own people more than the power of any other nation. And it is the responsibility of all free people and free nations to make clear that these movements - these movements of hope and history -
46. erstand why war is not popular, but I also know this: The belief that peace is desirable is rarely enough to achieve it. Peace requires responsibility. Peace entails sacrifice. That s why NATO continues tobe indispensable. That s why we must strengthen U.N.and regionalpeacekeeping, and not leave the
47. 3 品格诉诸(ethos)
48. 4 演讲技巧
49. ar do have a role to play in preserving the peace. And yet this truth must coexist with another - that no matter how justified, war promises human tragedy. The soldiers courage andsacrifice is full of glory, expressing devotion to country, to cause, to comrades in arms. But war itself is never glori
50. pursuit of justice; those who toil in humanitarian organizations to relieve suffering; the unrecognized millions whose quiet acts of courage and compassion inspire even the most hardened cynics. I cannot argue with those who find these men and women - some known, some obscure to all but those they h
51. 头韵（alliteration），即相邻或不相邻的一组词开头
52. ents, but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations. To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who have been honoured by this prize – men and women who have inspired me a
53. ，我深怀感激并深表谦恭。这个奖表达出我们的最高理想尽管这个世界存在种种凶残困苦，但我们并不任命运摆布。我们的行动是有作用的，能够推动历史向正义方向发展。And yet I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the considerable controversy that your generous decision has generated. (Laughter.) In part, this is because I am at the beginning, and not the end, of my labors on the world stage. Compared to some of the giants of history whove received this prize - Schweitzer and King; Marshall and Mandela - my accomplishments are slight. And then there are the men and women around th
54. 暗喻（metaphor）虽不是演讲最常用修辞之一，但也
55. ous, and we must never trumpet it as such.So part of our challenge is reconciling these two seemingly inreconcilable truths - that war is sometimes necessary, and war at some level is an expression of human folly. Concretely, we must direct our effort to the task that President Kennedycalled for lon
56. etween armies gave way to wars between nations - total wars in which the distinction between combatant and civilian becameblurred. In the span of 30 years, such carnage would twice engulf this continent. And while it s hard to conceive of a cause more just than the defeat of the Third Reich and the
57. the American people. For make no mistake: Evil does exist in the world. A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitler s armies. Negotiations cannot convince al Qaedasleaders to lay down their arms. To say that force may sometimes be necessary is not a call to cynicism - it is a recognition of
58. aging of war, treaties to protect human rights, prevent genocide, restrict the most dangerous weapons.In manyways, these efforts succeeded. Yes, terrible wars have been fought, and atrocities committed. But there has been no Third World War. The Cold War ended with jubilant crowds dismantling a wall